2️⃣Scenario 2 - ETH Price Declines
1. Liquidity Pool Dynamics:
Liquidity Pool Lag: With a dip in ETH value, the liquidity pool's rate might not instantly reflect the new burning price of $aETH due to the innate nature of decentralized exchanges and their reaction speed to market changes.
Arbitrage Opportunity: A divergence between the liquidity pool price of $aETH and its mint rate in terms of ETH presents an arbitrage opportunity. Savvy traders can seize this by minting $aETH from the contract at a beneficial rate and then selling it in the liquidity pool. This action has a dual effect:
It pushes the $aETH price in the liquidity pool downward, aligning it more with the reduced value of ETH.
Through the minting process, the intrinsic value of $aETH in terms of ETH increases due to the tax mechanism.
Balancing Act: As arbitrageurs leverage this opportunity, their actions serve to recalibrate the liquidity pool price of $aETH, ensuring it stays more harmonized with its peg to ETH.
2. Users Incentives in a Depreciating Market:
Minting Less Attractive: As ETH's value diminishes, the allure of minting $aETH might wane for users. This hesitance arises from the fact that the ETH they provide as collateral might now denote a larger portion of their portfolio's worth.
Redeeming's Rising Appeal: In contrast, the burning mechanism might gain traction. Traders can opt to burn and in return, redeem the cossrisponding amount of ETH, which they might either liquidate or retain based on their future price forecasts.
3. Tax Mechanism's Protective Role:
The attached 1% tax for every mint and redeem operates as a cushion, tempering the direct impacts of any abrupt ETH price fluctuations. This tax provision guarantees an uninterrupted value inflow into the $aETH ecosystem, instilling a level of price stability, even amid a receding ETH market.
Last updated